[LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout? (original) (raw)
Sanjoy Das sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com
Sun Oct 19 14:32:34 PDT 2014
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
I have a question:
1) Synthesizing a "default" boring DataLayout for all modules that don't specify one.
What is a default boring value for endianness?
-- Sanjoy
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] RFC: Are we ready to completely move away from the optionality of a DataLayout?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]