[LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS? (original) (raw)
Justin Bogner mail at justinbogner.com
Mon Feb 16 15:56:56 PST 2015
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] adapting clamav to LLVM 3.6
- Next message: [LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Currently, LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS is set based on
__has_feature(cxx_generalized_initializers) && !defined(_MSC_VER)
Based on the docs, we should be able to drop the _MSC_VER check now that we've moved to VS2013. Can somebody confirm that?
The other problem is that GCC doesn't recognize __has_feature, so this is essentially only enabled for clang. If we're keeping this check it should really check the GCC version as well - they've had these for quite a while now.
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] adapting clamav to LLVM 3.6
- Next message: [LLVMdev] Do we still need LLVM_HAS_INITIALIZER_LISTS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]