[LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf (original) (raw)
Joerg Sonnenberger joerg at britannica.bec.de
Tue Feb 17 12:21:15 PST 2015
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
- Next message: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:03:11AM +0000, Zachary Turner wrote:
+Ed Maste, who maintains FreeBSD's LLDB and probably does not check this very often. I know (or at least am pretty sure) that they are using autoconf over there, so he may be aware of other issues.
Just for the record, as far as NetBSD is concerned, LLDB without autoconf is a non-issue. autoconf is only relevant for the bootstrapping, so code outside llvm, clang and maybe lld is perfectly acceptable as cmake-only.
Joerg
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
- Next message: [LLVMdev] [RFC] Progress report on CMake build system's ability to replace autoconf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]