[llvm-dev] RFC: Representing unions in TBAA (original) (raw)
Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 10 08:09:50 PDT 2017
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] RFC: Representing unions in TBAA
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Should ValueTracking::GetUnderlyingObject stop on Alloca instructions rather than calling SimplifyInstruction?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/9/2017 8:40 PM, Xin Tong wrote:
I would like to see it disabled as well until fixed, we have problem compiling HHVM with clang due to this union+TBAA problem.
I posted a patch at https://reviews.llvm.org/D31885.
-Krzysztof
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] RFC: Representing unions in TBAA
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Should ValueTracking::GetUnderlyingObject stop on Alloca instructions rather than calling SimplifyInstruction?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]