[llvm-dev] Store unswitch (original) (raw)
Davide Italiano via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 26 07:48:23 PDT 2017
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Store unswitch
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Is there any real downside to constructing the new SimplifyQuery once
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like this do not work:
// Type your code here, or load an example. int a[10]; void unswitch2(int i, int x, int y0, int y1) { if (x) { a[i] = y0; a[i + 1] = y1; } else { a[i + 1] = y0; a[i] = y1; } }
Interestingly, only icc produces the same code for both forms in this case.
https://godbolt.org/g/Go7Hoo
I'm not entirely convinced this matters, but if you care, consider
opening a bug on llvm.org/bugs and/or submitting a patch.
-- Davide
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Store unswitch
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Is there any real downside to constructing the new SimplifyQuery once
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]