[llvm-dev] Is it a good idea to mark class as deprecated? (original) (raw)
陳韋任 via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 27 07:13:15 PDT 2017
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] recognise DW_AT_SUN_amd64_parmdump dwarf attribute
- Next message: [llvm-dev] -ffast-math optimizations impacted by symbol renaming in header files
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi All,
During a discussion about instruction scheduling in LLVM [1], I realize that class PostRASchedulerList actually is deprecated. The documentation of instruction scheduling is pretty poor, so I cannot find such information. Removing the obsoleted class might be too aggressive. I am wondering if we can mark the class as deprecated [2] (seems C++14 feature required), or at least making a note on [3].
Thoughts? :-)
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-April/112358.html [2] http://josephmansfield.uk/articles/marking-deprecated-c++14.html [3] http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#selectiondag-scheduling-and-formation-phase
-- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Homepage: https://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] recognise DW_AT_SUN_amd64_parmdump dwarf attribute
- Next message: [llvm-dev] -ffast-math optimizations impacted by symbol renaming in header files
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]