[llvm-dev] Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32) (original) (raw)
Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 3 11:16:32 PST 2018
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Phabricator default view
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"David Blaikie" <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:11 AM Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <_ _llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
[...]
Finally, sending mail to llvm-bugs is practically useless. I don't know of anyone that is tracking mails to that list rather than actual bug reports.
The list is setup to not accept email, basically
That's VERY nice for a mailing list. NOT!
- I'm one of the moderators there & any email sent there that doesn't come from the bug database will get automatically or manually rejected with the suggestion/request that the bug database is used instead.
NO! The following text is sent back:
| You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message has | been automatically rejected. If you think that your messages are | being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at | llvm-bugs-owner at lists.llvm.org.
I recommend/request that this list EITHER be opened for bug reports, OR not announced on <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo> any more!
Stefan
[ fullquote removed ]
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Phabricator default view
- Next message: [llvm-dev] Rather poor code optimisation of current clang/LLVM targeting Intel x86 (both -64 and -32)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]