[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [Github] RFC: linear history vs merge commits (original) (raw)
via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 1 07:25:01 PST 2019
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Variable names rule
- Next message: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [Github] RFC: linear history vs merge commits
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----Original Message----- From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of David Greene via cfe-dev Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 4:56 PM To: Roman Lebedev Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] [Github] RFC: linear history vs merge commits
Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> writes: > Does LLVM want to switch from phabricator to github pr's? > I personally don't recall previous discussions. > Personally, i hope not, i hope phabricator should/will stay. I find Phab pretty unintuitive. I just started using it in earnest about four months ago, so that's one datapoint from people new to it.
Heh. Years ago I described it as "actively user-hostile." Merely being unintuitive is a huge step forward. I don't know how much of that is the local LLVM instance being massaged toward usefulness as opposed to improvements in the underlying product. --paulr
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] Variable names rule
- Next message: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [Github] RFC: linear history vs merge commits
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]