[llvm-dev] ADT/SmallSet missing operator ==? (original) (raw)
De Azevedo Piovezan, Felipe via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 28 10:15:49 PST 2019
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] False positive about Use of memory after it is freed for OpenJDK
- Next message: [llvm-dev] .ARM.exidx woes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,
Contrary to std::set, SmallSet does not define an operator ==. While it's not difficult to implement it, I was hoping it would be possible to use it as a drop-in replacement for std::set (modulo the fact that SmallSet does not guarantee sorted iteration order). Is there a special reason for this or is it just a matter that nobody was ever interested in it?
Thanks
Felipe
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190228/e704edfd/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] False positive about Use of memory after it is freed for OpenJDK
- Next message: [llvm-dev] .ARM.exidx woes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]