[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues (original) (raw)
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 3 09:51:07 PST 2020
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
- Next message: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday, February 3, 2020, Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 09:11 Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues To: Michael Kruse <cfe-dev at meinersbur.de> Cc: Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com>, llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 09:00 Michael Kruse <cfe-dev at meinersbur.de> wrote: Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 13:29 Uhr schrieb Jacob Lifshay via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 10:22 Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <_ _llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I want to restart this discussion. There seemed to be support for this, >> but we got held up trying to decide on the appropriate set of tags to >> use to classify issues. >> >> I propose that we move forward with this proposal and disable creation of >> new bugs in bugzilla on Feb 11, and require all new bugs be filed via GitHub >> issues from that date forward. please don't.
as jacob says that will be yet another project that libre ethical developers plus individuals who have not received authorisation and are under explicit instructions never to register on social platforms plus iranian and other developers will be prevented and prohibited from interacting with llvm at a basic and fundamental level: bugreporting.
plus: do not be offended, i am deliberately raising the "thorny" perspective if you know what i mean (because almost without a doubt noone else will).
consider this: what kind of message does it send to developers wishing to contribute to a project if the admins are so... "incompetent" (strong word, you know what i mean) that they cannot self-host their own infrastructure, independent of corporate and other control?
the way i see it: as maintainers of high profile mission critical infrastructure for the entire planet's software we have a duty and a responsibility to be fully independent and impartial, with no corporate sponsors or services that may be pulled at any time and blackmail effectively deployed with zero warning.
what happens if the US decides that yet another country is to be added to their Trade and Sanctions War?
you really want to place the bugtracker and hosting at the mercy and political whim of not just a corporation but of one of the most irresponsible governments of the 21st century?
moo?
:)
food for thought.
l.
--
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200203/81811745/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
- Next message: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]