Is anyone able to build on Win 7 (original) (raw)

Volker Simonis volker.simonis at gmail.com
Thu Mar 8 18:00:52 UTC 2012


This thread will probably never end (Windows 2046 :)

So I did more test......

Finally I decided to try something new - MinGW/MSYS.

And indeed - it worked, it's nearly as fast as MKS, it can use the default make which comes with the MinGW/Installation. Read the glory details at:

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2012-March/005729.html

Please feel free to test, review and (hopfully) submit it.

The changes are intentionally against the old, "traditional" build system to fix the mentioned Cygwin problems and simplify the Windows build just now.

As next steps I see the following points:

Any comments?

Volker

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Fredrik Öhrström <fredrik.ohrstrom at oracle.com> wrote:

----- kelly.ohair at oracle.com skrev:

So I'm with you on the stat() theory, makes a great deal of sense. The stat theory is very interesting, but it is unclear to me if it explains all of the problem. I setup a quadruple boot x8664 machine with 4GB of ram and 4 cores: Winxp 32bit Win7 64bit Solaris 64bit Ubuntu 64bit And tested the build times on the different OS:es. Ubuntu Fastest by far. Solaris, slower, but this is only because of bad CC performance. Winxp, even slower but still ok. Win7, ridiculously slow. The configure script prints one line per second! Clearly, just running a bash script in cygwin/win7/64bit is problematic. If we get 10% speedup from dash, then that is not going to help because the slowdown is a factor 10. Could someone try out the difference between a 32bit win7 clean install and a 64 bit win7 clean install when running the latest cygwin and just the build-infra/jdk8/common/autoconf/configure script? (My patience for installing many OSes into the same box, just ran out. And virtualization testing can give a hint, but cannot be entirely trusted.) //Fredrik



More information about the build-dev mailing list