New build system problems (original) (raw)
Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Mon Feb 25 22:10:37 UTC 2013
- Previous message (by thread): New build system problems
- Next message (by thread): New build system problems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm willing to let someone else on build-dev take over this change, or I can implement some clear policy. It seems reasonable to do:
windows => cl solaris => cc gcc anything else => gcc cc
With environment variables to allow experimental use of insane^Wunsupported compilers.
Do we have consensus on that?
Martin
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Dmitry Samersoff < dmitry.samersoff at oracle.com> wrote:
1. for windows compiler checklist become: cl cc gcc I'm not sure we need to check for cc on windows, also gcc build on windows is not supported. So It might be better to be more explicit: 256 COMPILERCHECKLIST="cc gcc" # Overriding COMPILERCHECKLIST to set OS specific preferences 257 if test "x$OPENJDKTARGETOS" = "xmacosx"; then 258 # Do not probe for cc on MacOSX. 259 COMPILERCHECKLIST="gcc" 260 fi 261 if test "x$OPENJDKTARGETOS" = "xwindows"; then 262 COMPILERCHECKLIST="cl" 263 fi
2. Not all versions of test support == as equation. It's better to use single one. and I would prefer to have quotes around xmacosx and xwindows just for consistency. i.e. if test "x$OPENJDKTARGETOS" = "xwindows"; -Dmitry On 2013-02-24 00:05, Martin Buchholz wrote: > Hi Erik, Tim, Kelly > > Here's a proposed fix for you to review: > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk8/COMPILERCHECKLIST/ > > Martin > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com_ _>wrote: > >> I was trying out the shiny new build system. >> >> Problem: configure is not executable - must run bash ./configure >> It's traditional for configure scripts to be executable. >> >> Problem: Your life is hell if you have a non-compiler "cl" command on your >> PATH, even on Linux. >> >> checking for cl... /usr/bin/cl >> configure: Resolving CC (as /usr/bin/cl) failed, using /usr/bin/cl >> directly. >> >> with subsequent failure to compile. >> >> Even if you specify the compiler explicitly, it doesn't help: >> >> CC=/usr/bin/gcc CXX=/usr/bin/g++ bash ./configure >> >> Of course, one can work around this by creating a "tools dir", but >> excising the unloved cl from the configure script is tempting and effective. >> -- Dmitry Samersoff Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia * Give Rabbit time, and he'll always get the answer
- Previous message (by thread): New build system problems
- Next message (by thread): New build system problems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]