RFR: 8145132: Initial updates for ios x86_64 mobile/dev builds. (original) (raw)

Bob Vandette bob.vandette at oracle.com
Mon Dec 21 20:48:27 UTC 2015

Thomas,

It is definitely not too late. The push that Gary did was to our mobile/dev forest which is not the final forest before integration into OpenJDK. We pushed this to mobile/dev in order to allow interested developers to begin working with these changes and to provide us with feedback.

The final changesets will end up going to mobile/jdk9. This is the staging forest that we will eventually integrate into the mainline OpenJDK sources.

Bob.

On Dec 18, 2015, at 9:17 PM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Bob and Gary, Thank you for correcting this! Respect also on this large porting effort, this looks like a lot of work and I am curious how this will turn out. I took a short look at your changes - especially the android-related changes - and have a number of further questions and suggestions . I hope that this is okay and the door is not already closed. I'm away from any computer however (ironically typing this from an android device, so anything weird is due to auto correct :), so before Monday I will not be able to do anything. I also think that this may be interesting to hotspot-runtime, because the changes to the OS layer are somewhat extensive, so I'll take the freedom and put them on the recipient list. Kind regards, Thomas On Dec 18, 2015 22:16, "Bob Vandette" <bob.vandette at oracle.com <mailto:bob.vandette at oracle.com>> wrote: I caught that and gave Gary an updated set of oslinux* files that hopefully corrected this. Here’s the updated changes that Gary just pushed today. http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mobile/dev/hotspot/rev/f1acc8fa34b8 <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mobile/dev/hotspot/rev/f1acc8fa34b8>

Bob. > On Dec 18, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com <mailto:thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > In the Linux os layer - especially in oslinux.cpp - I see you have > reintroduced old coding we just painstakingly removed because it was not > needed for modern Linuxes anymore. For instance, coding dealing with old > Linuxthreads (vs Nptl, which is ubiquitous nowadays) or workarounds for old > glibc bugs. Is this really needed for Android? Or is this just a merge > error? > > Kind regards, Thomas > On Dec 11, 2015 16:15, "Gary Adams" <gary.adams at oracle.com <mailto:gary.adams at oracle.com>> wrote: > >> Here's the initial upload of changes that provides support for the ios and >> android ports >> for the mobile/dev repos. While there have been some preliminary reviews >> of the code, >> there is still more work required before we will look for more thorough >> reviews >> and an integration to mobile/jdk9 repos. >> >> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145132 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145132> >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gadams/8145132/webrev.00/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gadams/8145132/webrev.00/> >> >> >> Here's a simple configure script to generate a ios-x8664 build for use >> with the iphone simulator. (uses homebrew 64 bit freetype from pkgconfig) >> >> export JAVAHOME=/usr/libexec/javahome -v 1.8 >> export PATH=$JAVAHOME/bin:~/homebrew/bin:$PATH >> _>> bash ../../configure _ _>> --openjdk-target=x8664-macos-ios _ _>> --with-boot-jdk=$JAVAHOME _ _>> --disable-warnings-as-errors _ _>> --disable-headful _ _>> --enable-static-build=yes _ >> --with-jvm-variants=minimal1 >> >> >> Also, tested with i586-macos-ios target for 32 bit >> with a locally built --with-freetype 2.6.2. >>

More information about the build-dev mailing list