[PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration (original) (raw)
Alexey Ivanov alexey.ivanov at oracle.com
Wed Dec 12 16:14:48 UTC 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Forgot to add the link:
On 12/12/2018 16:10, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
Ali has scanned the code base, he says, “couldn’t find (hopefully tbh) other occurrences of such mismatches.”
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-December/024358.html
On 10/12/2018 10:45, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: It might be worthwhile to scan the entire code base for JNICALL and verify that we have no more mismatches. In general, JNICALL should be preserved on all officially supported, exported interfaces. It need not be present on interfaces used only internally, and my current thinking is that it would be better if it were removed on all internal interfaces. But at the very least, it should be consistently specificed where exported and imported. (Any misses here is probably due to duplicate declarations, instead of properly including header files, so that's the correct way to resolve any problems found...)
-- Regards, Alexey
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]