RFR : 8204541 Correctly support AIX xlC 13.1 symbol visibility flags (original) (raw)
Ichiroh Takiguchi takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jun 7 16:29:09 UTC 2018
- Previous message (by thread): RFR : 8204541 Correctly support AIX xlC 13.1 symbol visibility flags
- Next message (by thread): RFR : 8204541 Correctly support AIX xlC 13.1 symbol visibility flags
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello Christoph
According to build log, if <#include "osSupport.hpp"> was there: "/home/jdktest/sandbox/jdk/build/aix-ppc64-normal-server-release/support/headers/java.base/jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer.h", line 15.27: 1540-0040 (S) The text "Java_jdk_internal_jimage_NativeImageBuffer_getNativeMap" is unexpected. "visibility" may be undeclared or ambiguous. make[3]: *** [/home/jdktest/sandbox/jdk/build/aix-ppc64-normal-server-release/support/native/java.base/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jdktest/sandbox/jdk/make' make[2]: *** [java.base-libs] Error 2 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
On 2018-06-07 22:06, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Ichiroh,
what's the exact error message if you #include "osSupport.hpp"? (I have no xlC 13 at hand to try myself...) Best regards Christoph
-----Original Message----- From: Ichiroh Takiguchi [mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2018 14:53 To: build-dev at openjdk.java.net; ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; core- libs-dev at openjdk.java.net Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com> Subject: RFR : 8204541 Correctly support AIX xlC 13.1 symbol visibility flags
Hello. Could you review it ? Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204541 Change: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8204541.0/ Thanks, Ichiroh Takiguchi IBM Japan, Ltd. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc 12.1 Date: 2018-06-07 20:43 From: "Langer, Christoph" <christoph.langer at sap.com> To: Ichiroh Takiguchi <takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: "'build-dev at openjdk.java.net'" <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>, "ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net" <ppc-aix-port-_ _dev at openjdk.java.net>, "core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net" <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>, "Lindenmaier, Goetz" <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>, "Baesken, Matthias" <matthias.baesken at sap.com> Hi Ichiroh, your proposal seems to make sense. I have created a bug for this: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204541 Can you please generate a webrev (referencing this bug, -c option of webrev.ksh) and mail it over to me. Then I'll upload it and you can post an official RFR mail. Best regards Christoph > -----Original Message----- > From: Ichiroh Takiguchi [mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 5. Juni 2018 08:59 > To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com> > Cc: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; 'build- > dev at openjdk.java.net' <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port- > dev at openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, > Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> > Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on > xlc 12.1 > > Hello Matthias and Christoph. > Thank you for your explanations. > > I did not have enough knowledge about "visibility". > > I created following patches. > > ================================ > diff -r 02934b0d661b > src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.cpp > --- a/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.cpp Wed > May > 30 14:46:28 2018 +0200 > +++ b/src/java.base/share/native/libjimage/NativeImageBuffer.cpp Tue > Jun > 05 12:10:41 2018 +0900 > @@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ > #include "imageFile.hpp" > #include "inttypes.hpp" > #include "jimage.hpp" > +#if !defined(AIX) > #include "osSupport.hpp" > +#endif > > #include "jdkinternaljimageNativeImageBuffer.h" > > diff -r 02934b0d661b src/java.base/unix/native/include/jnimd.h > --- a/src/java.base/unix/native/include/jnimd.h Wed May 30 14:46:28 > 2018 +0200 > +++ b/src/java.base/unix/native/include/jnimd.h Tue Jun 05 12:10:41 > 2018 +0900 > @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ _> #ifndef hasattribute _> #define hasattribute(x) 0 > #endif > -#if (defined(GNUC) && ((GNUC > 4) || (GNUC == 4) && _> (GNUCMINOR > 2))) || hasattribute(visibility) > +#if (defined(GNUC) && ((GNUC > 4) || (GNUC == 4) && _> (GNUCMINOR > 2))) || _hasattribute(visibility) _ > + || (defined(AIX) && (defined(xlC) && (xlC >= 0xD01))) > #ifdef ARM > #define JNIEXPORT > attribute((externallyvisible,visibility("default"))) > #define JNIIMPORT > attribute((externallyvisible,visibility("default"))) > ================================ > > If "osSupport.hpp" was included, XLC++ compiler complained. > I could not understand, which part was invalid... > I'm not sure, "osSupport.hpp" is really required on > NativeImageBuffer.cpp or not... > > I added xlC macro to determine XLC/C++'s version# into jnimd.h. > [1] > 0xD01 means 13.1 by hexadecimal. > > I checked symbol table by "dump -Tv -X64". [2] > It seemed it was fine, some symbols were hidden. > > Does someone review my code? > > [1] > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSGH2K13.1.3/com.i > bm.xlc1313.aix.doc/compilerref/xlmacros.html > [2] > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-aix-symbol- > visibility/index.html > > On 2018-06-01 21:12, Baesken, Matthias wrote: > > Hi , my change 8202322 just handled the fact that the > > visibility - flags are not supported with xlc 12.1 , so setting > > them generated a TON of compile - time warnings . > > > > The introduction of the "-qvisibility=hidden" came with the > > mapfile removal changes : > > > > 8200358: Remove mapfiles for JDK executables > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/210cf224b690 > > > > 8200178: Remove mapfiles for JDK native libraries > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/396ea30afbd5 > > > > I guess it might need further testing+adjustments to make the > > "visibility hiding" work nicely with XLC13 , but currently we > > build only with XLC12 . > > > > As a workaround you might want to remove the "-qvisibility=hidden" > > setting for XLC 13 as well , like I did for XLC12 with the change > > 8202322 . > > > > > > Best regards, Matthias > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Langer, Christoph > >> Sent: Freitag, 1. Juni 2018 10:57 > >> To: Ichiroh Takiguchi <takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >> Cc: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; 'build- > >> dev at openjdk.java.net' <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port- > >> dev at openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, > >> Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> > >> Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support > >> on xlc 12.1 > >> > >> Hi Ichiroh, > >> > >> we do not use the XLC 13 compiler on AIX yet here at SAP and I believe > >> nobody of my colleagues has played with it yet. So you are on a new > >> playground here 😊 > >> > >> However, I believe the idea in OpenJDK with the abolition of map files > >> is that > >> symbols should be invisible externally unless they are declared > >> exported, > >> e.g. JNIEXPORT. So I would think "-qvisibility=hidden" should be the > >> correct > >> default and whatever JNIEXPORT expands to should contain the right > >> attributes to get that symbol visible. > >> > >> Can you check if either my assumption is completely wrong, JNIEXPORT > >> does > >> not expand to the right thing, XLC 13 has a bug or maybe just sume > >> specific > >> required symbols are not declared correctly? > >> > >> Best regards > >> Christoph > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: Ichiroh Takiguchi [mailto:takiguc at linux.vnet.ibm.com] > >> > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2018 09:55 > >> > To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com> > >> > Cc: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baesken at sap.com>; 'build- > >> > dev at openjdk.java.net' <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port- > >> > dev at openjdk.java.net; core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier, > >> > Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> > >> > Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc > 12.1 > >> > > >> > Hello. > >> > 8202322 was integrated into jdk-11+15. > >> > I'm using XLC 13.1.3 on AIX 7.1.4. > >> > Build was failed because of "-qvisibility=hidden" on > >> > make/lib/LibCommon.gmk. > >> > According to "XL C/C++ for AIX 13.1.3" documentation [1], > >> > "-qvisibility=hidden" cannot create shared libraries entry points. > >> > For example, libverify.so was there, but entry points were not resolved > >> > by "-lverify" option. > >> > I think it should be "-qvisibility=default" (I tried, it worked) > >> > or "-qvisibility=protected" (I had not tried) ? > >> > I'm not familiar with -qvisibility option, but I'd like to find out > >> > right way. > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > > >> > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGH3R13.1.3/com.ibm. > >> > xlcpp1313.aix.doc/compilerref/optvisibility.html > >> > > >> > On 2018-05-16 16:08, Langer, Christoph wrote: > >> > > Hi Matthias, > >> > > > >> > > yes, reviewed. > >> > > > >> > > Best regards > >> > > Christoph > >> > > > >> > > From: Baesken, Matthias > >> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2018 09:06 > >> > > To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.langer at sap.com>; > >> > > 'build-dev at openjdk.java.net' <build-dev at openjdk.java.net>; > >> > > ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net; core-libs- dev at openjdk.java.net > >> > > Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com> > >> > > Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on > >> > > xlc 12.1 > >> > > > >> > > Hi Christoph can I add you as second reviewer (other reviewer was > >> > > Erik Joelsson) can push the change ? > >> > > > >> > > Best regards, Matthias > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > From: Langer, Christoph > >> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 26. April 2018 16:38 > >> > > To: Baesken, Matthias > >> > > <matthias.baesken at sap.com<mailto:matthias.baesken at sap.com>>; > >> > > 'build-dev at openjdk.java.net' > >> > > <build-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:build-_ _> dev at openjdk.java.net>>; > >> > > ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:ppc-aix-port-_ _> >> > dev at openjdk.java.net>; > >> > > core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-_ _> >> dev at openjdk.java.net> > >> > > Cc: Simonis, Volker > >> > > <volker.simonis at sap.com<mailto:volker.simonis at sap.com>> > >> > > Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on > >> > > xlc 12.1 > >> > > > >> > > Hi Matthias, > >> > > > >> > > to me the change in principal looks good. > >> > > > >> > > I'm wondering if it is possible to do a comparison like xlc < 13 (e.g._ _> >> > > extract major number before the first dot, then compare numerically) > - > >> > > but maybe it is too complicated and the current single version > compare > >> > > suits our needs ? > >> > > > >> > > Best regards > >> > > Christoph > >> > > > >> > > From: Baesken, Matthias > >> > > Sent: Donnerstag, 26. April 2018 16:14 > >> > > To: 'build-dev at openjdk.java.net' > >> > > <build-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:build-_ _> dev at openjdk.java.net>>; > >> > > ppc-aix-port-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:ppc-aix-port-_ _> >> > dev at openjdk.java.net>; > >> > > core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net<mailto:core-libs-_ _> >> dev at openjdk.java.net> > >> > > Cc: Langer, Christoph > >> > > <christoph.langer at sap.com<mailto:christoph.langer at sap.com>>; > >> Simonis, > >> > > Volker <volker.simonis at sap.com<mailto:volker.simonis at sap.com>> > >> > > Subject: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc > >> > > 12.1 > >> > > > >> > > Hello , could you please review this small adjustment to the symbol > >> > > visibility compilation settings on AIX ? > >> > > Currently we use XLC 12.1 to compile JDK on AIX . > >> > > > >> > > However XLC 12.1 does not support the "-qvisibility=hidden" > >> > > setting currently set on AIX. > >> > > It was introduced with XLC 13.1 . Christoph found some info about it > >> > > here : > >> > > > >> > > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-aix-symbol- > >> > visibility-part2/index.html > >> > > > >> > > Setting it only generates hundreds of warnings in the build log , > >> > > warnings look like this : > >> > > XlC12.1 > >> > > > >> > > bash-4.4$ xlC -qversion > >> > > IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V12.1 (5765-J02, 5725-C72) > >> > > Version: 12.01.0000.0019 > >> > > > >> > > bash-4.4$ xlC -qvisibility=hidden sizeof.c -o sizeofaixxlc > >> > > 1506-173 (W) Option visibility=hidden is not valid. Enter xlC for list > >> > > of valid options. > >> > > > >> > > Compare to XLC13.1 > >> > > > >> > > bash-3.00$ xlC -qversion > >> > > IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V13.1 (5725-C72, 5765-J07) > >> > > Version: 13.01.0000.0008 > >> > > bash-3.00$ xlC -qvisibility=default sizeof.c -o sizeofaixxlc > >> > > bash-3.00$ xlC -qvisibility=hidden sizeof.c -o sizeofaixxlc > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > So it is better to avoid setting these flags when using xlc12.1 . > >> > > Please review : > >> > > > >> > > Bug : > >> > > > >> > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202322 > >> > > > >> > > Change : > >> > > > >> > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8202322/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Best regards, Matthias
- Previous message (by thread): RFR : 8204541 Correctly support AIX xlC 13.1 symbol visibility flags
- Next message (by thread): RFR : 8204541 Correctly support AIX xlC 13.1 symbol visibility flags
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]