[PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling (original) (raw)

Lindenmaier, Goetz goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com
Tue Oct 2 12:39:16 UTC 2018

Hi Severin,

here for example: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2015-July/015370.html While the fix proposed there looks different and the downport was never finished.

Best regards, Goetz.

-----Original Message----- From: Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf at redhat.com> Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 13:09 To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenmaier at sap.com>; Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>; hotspot-dev <hotspot-_ _dev at openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-_ _dev at openjdk.java.net>; build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net> Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling

Hi Goetz, On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 10:40 +0000, Lindenmaier, Goetz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm fine with this. Thanks for the review! > If I remember correctly, this was proposed before but > never pushed in the end. Interesting. > Did you test this on ppc64 be, too? I have not. Will do so, though. Thanks, Severin > Best regards, > Goetz. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ppc-aix-port-dev <ppc-aix-port-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On > > Behalf Of Severin Gehwolf > > Sent: Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018 12:34 > > To: Erik Joelsson <erik.joelsson at oracle.com>; hotspot-dev > dev at openjdk.java.net>; ppc-aix-port-dev > dev at openjdk.java.net>; build-dev <build-dev at openjdk.java.net> > > Subject: Re: [PING] [8u] RFR: 8073139: PPC64: User-visible arch directory and > > os.arch value on ppc64le cause issues with Java tooling > > > > Hi, > > > > Pinging PPC porters. Does this look reasonable to you? > > > > Thanks, > > Severin > > > > > > On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 08:56 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > > Build changes look ok to me. > > > > > > /Erik > > > > > > > > > On 2018-09-26 04:26, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Could I please get reviews for this JDK 8 backport which fixes some > > > > tooling issues on Linux ppc64le? Prior this patch, a ppc64le build > > > > would report as "ppc64" via os.arch system property which breaks > > > > tooling such as maven in as much as if some dependency needs native > > > > libraries it would download BE binaries where it actually should > > > > download LE binaries. Example for os.arch/java.library.path: > > > > > > > > pre: > > > > $ ./jdk8-pre-ppc64le/bin/java TestProperty > > > > java.library.path = > > > > /usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib > > > > os.arch = ppc64 > > > > > > > > post: > > > > $ ./jdk8-post-ppc64le/bin/java TestProperty > > > > java.library.path = > > > > /usr/java/packages/lib/ppc64le:/usr/lib64:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib > > > > os.arch = ppc64le > > > > > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073139 > > > > webrevs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK- > > > > 8073139/jdk8/01/ > > > > > > > > Including build-dev for build changes. hotspot-dev and ppc-aix-port- dev > > > > for JDK/hotspot changes. > > > > > > > > This backport should only have minor differences to the changes in JDK > > > > 11. We have been using similar patches in Fedora for months. Thoughts? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Severin > > > > > > > > > > > >

More information about the build-dev mailing list