Better jcov integration (original) (raw)
Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 14:11:13 UTC 2018
- Previous message: Better jcov integration
- Next message: Better jcov integration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Eric,
What's your GitHub user id? I'll add you to the AdoptOpenJDK org and you can take a look. I think the maven jdeps plugin is there as well as a new jsplitpkgscan tool we're working on.
Cheers, Martijn
On 1 March 2018 at 01:41, Eric McCorkle <eric at metricspace.net> wrote:
Definitely worth considering.
If you have source repositories for those plugins, it could probably help me figure out the documentation-generation issue that I have. On 02/28/2018 08:13, Martijn Verburg wrote: > Hi Eric, > > If it can’t be accepted as an net.openjdk project then we could host it > at AdoptOpenJDK (we already have some OpenJDK related Maven plugins > there for example). > > I’ll let Jonathan et al comment on the rest. > > Cheers, > Martijn > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 at 12:43, Eric McCorkle <eric at metricspace.net_ _> <mailto:eric at metricspace.net>> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I recently found myself needing better integration of jcov into various > build/testing tools, so I did two things. First, I modified the jcov > tool to generate a report in the Cobertura XML format, which is used by > Jenkins and other tools as an input format. While these reports are > inferior in my opinion to the HTML reports jcov generates, they do allow > integration with other tools and CI systems. Therefore, I think > providing this functionality would likely encourage more people to use > jcov over the alternatives. > > I've attached the patch for this modification here, if anyone would like > to review it. > > > I've also mostly wrangled the Maven plugin API to create a plugin for > using jcov in a Maven project (however, there is one remaining issue > with documentation generation that I need to correct before I call the > plugin "finished"). I'm not sure if that would be something that would > be added to codetools, if the group ID should be something like > "org.openjdk", or what else ought to be done about it. I will gladly > contribute the code if there's a desire to adopt it. > > -- > Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)
- Previous message: Better jcov integration
- Next message: Better jcov integration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]