PROPOSAL: Lightweight Properties (original) (raw)
Marek Kozieł develop4lasu at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 09:06:02 PST 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Lightweight Properties
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Lightweight Properties
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi.
I do not know if I understand you right.
MAJOR DISADVANTAGE:
- Property names can be dropped (methods not).
- Linking naming with code logics.
Other proposal that may make yours one unnecessarily:
add @ operator (or ^) method@ would return Method object for given method. field@ would return Field object for given field.
- This should allow u to write classes u need and make language almost 100% as it is.
- It would be faster.
- Independend from names.
I might be wrong so tell me if I missed something.
-- Pozdrowionka. / Regards. Lasu aka Marek Kozieł
http://lasu2string.blogspot.com/
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Lightweight Properties
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Lightweight Properties
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]