PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals (original) (raw)
Michael Nascimento misterm at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 08:57:40 PDT 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Kevin Bourrillion <kevinb at google.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org> wrote:
- Constructor literals have to be included. If you don't then developers will find it an unexplained gap. See FCM section 2.2 which uses Type#(argTypes) Yes, and the worst case scenario is to mimic the Javadoc syntax: ArrayList#ArrayList(int).
Nope, since this, unfortunately, is a valid method name :-(
The ugly alternative would be Type#(argTypes).
Regards, Michael Nascimento Santos https://genesis.dev.java.net/ https://jsr-310.dev.java.net/
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Method and Field Literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]