Feedback and comments on ARM proposal (original) (raw)
Howard Lovatt howard.lovatt at iee.org
Wed Mar 18 01:11:46 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
- Next message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joshua,
I think everyone would like this change. If we introduce a source keyword, another proposal in coin, then we could!
Howard.
2009/3/18 Joshua Bloch <jjb at google.com>:
And switch should never have supported a fallthrough (in Java). It should have bee structured like the rest of control constructs. Sigh.... Josh
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Jeremy Manson <jeremy.manson at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote: > i = 1; // i is not definitely assigned here, so we assign to > it The compiler is traditionally not very happy when you assign a value to a final variable. :) Jeremy
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
- Previous message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
- Next message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]