Feedback and comments on ARM proposal (original) (raw)
Joshua Bloch jjb at google.com
Fri Mar 20 08:57:53 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
- Next message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Neal, Please report your "ergonomic issues" now, so that I can take advantage of your work in the next rev, which I hope to write this weekend.
Thanks,
Josh
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Joshua Bloch <jjb at google.com> wrote:
>> I'm still hoping to see a revision of the proposal that incorporates >> the changes you suggested be considered... > > In the next couple days. Excellent. I'm retrofitting of a bunch of code using the new construct and, while I don't have a complete compiler for the construct, I have enough experience using it to raise a few ergonomic issues in both the syntax and semantics that should be addressed. I'd rather report that feedback based on the latest version of the proposal.
- Previous message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal - resend
- Next message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]