Feedback and comments on ARM proposal (original) (raw)
Mark Mahieu markmahieu at googlemail.com
Sat Mar 21 09:37:32 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
- Next message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Josh,
2009/3/21 Joshua Bloch <jjb at google.com>
What if you have an interface that extends an interface that extends the magic marker? There should be nothing wrong with that. While there may be some easy way to specify this (and give it reasonable semantics) it isn't jumping out at me. If anyone has any clever ideas along these lines, I'd love to know.
I'm probably missing the point, but doesn't the JLS generally use the phrase 'is a subtype of' to describe this kind of relationship?
Mark
- Previous message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
- Next message: Feedback and comments on ARM proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]