I need your opinion... (original) (raw)
rssh at gradsoft.com.ua rssh at gradsoft.com.ua
Sat Mar 21 13:56:07 PDT 2009
- Previous message: I need your opinion...
- Next message: I need your opinion...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
1. After some time, I found that there was better solution for consider operator: Allow final variables and final Fields (except blank final), to not having explicit Type. Consider operator can help in dealing with generics, which are pain in the as.. I often found that Types took even 50% code, which is insane. Normal: for ( ComparablePair<String,StatisticsCollector> pair : statisticsCollectors ){ Б─і } Consider operator: for ( ::pair : statisticsCollectors ){ Б─і }
Good, but not 'strictly' required.
New final way: for ( final pair : statisticsCollectors ){ Б─і }
New final way & while-each loop: while ( final pair : final iterator = statisticsCollectors.iterator() ){ if ( ! isValid(pair.getKey()) ) iterator.remove( pair ); } 2. Add forget keyword to allow erase variable from current context (block): - For method parameters it's now impossible. - Assigning null to variable is lame and not possible for final variables. - Blocks not always fit to this purpose.
Why ?
3. Are glue classes hard to understand?
Exists many more-known names for similar functionality ('traits', as in scala, 'flawors' in lisp dialects)
4. Blocks in classes: Peoples often do not use formatters because they do not keep logical order in class structure, this would allow to define proper grouping.
class Some{ { // block boo private Boo boo; public Boo getBoo(){ return boo; } public void setBoo(Boo boo){ this.boo = boo; } }//end block }
This I can't understand. I. e. block without any semantics - why ?
- Previous message: I need your opinion...
- Next message: I need your opinion...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]