PROPOSAL: Elvis operator (original) (raw)
Stephen Colebourne scolebourne at joda.org
Sat Mar 21 14:42:15 PDT 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Elvis operator
- Next message: Fwd: PROPOSAL: Elvis operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I'm re-submitting the Elvis operator as a separate proposal to ensure it is treated as such. So far I've not heard any arguments against this on this list, and there are lots of positives.
To be absolutely clear - the original proposal "Elvis and other null-safe operators" remains alive, I haven't revoked it. The purpose of this proposal today is to allow Elvis to be considered on its own, and in addition to the combination of Elvis and null-safe access.
Stephen
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Elvis operator
- Next message: Fwd: PROPOSAL: Elvis operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]