Tiny update to Improved Exception Handling: @SuppressWarnings (original) (raw)
Roel Spilker r.spilker at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 01:38:16 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Tiny update to Improved Exception Handling: @SuppressWarnings
- Next message: Anyone ever considered named tuples?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I prefer
catch (@SuppressWarnings("unthrown") IOException e) {}
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Reinier Zwitserloot < reinier at zwitserloot.com> wrote:
If the suggestion to remove the requirement that catch blocks are reachable is accepted, I suggest such code should still generate a warning. You can put @SuppressWarnings on the exception block, like so:
try { int x = 5 + 5; } catch ( @SuppressWarnings("unreachable") IOException iDontOccurInTryBlock) { //whatever }
Perhaps the notion that the compiler will presume that annotation is referring to the catch block should be added to the proposal. --Reinier Zwitserloot (on behalf of Roel Spilker, who came up with this).
- Previous message: Tiny update to Improved Exception Handling: @SuppressWarnings
- Next message: Anyone ever considered named tuples?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]