PROPOSAL: Auto-assignment Parameters (original) (raw)
Mark Mahieu markmahieu at googlemail.com
Thu Mar 26 12:27:39 PDT 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Auto-assignment Parameters
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Auto-assignment Parameters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/3/25 Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org>
Very cool. I like it.
Thanks!
> DESIGN ALTERNATIVES: > > The following variations have been explored and are worth mentioning: > > * Allow auto-assignment parameters on all non-abstract methods. > This may be especially useful on the extremely common 'setter' methods > in 'value object' classes.
I think its right to leave this out for now, pending more investigation into a bigger properties solution.
Perhaps so, although it would be a very simple way to improve the state of affairs for POJOs right now. The additions to the grammar could be a little smaller than those I proposed as well :)
Stephen
Mark
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Auto-assignment Parameters
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Auto-assignment Parameters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]