Proposal: Collection Literals (original) (raw)
Vilya Harvey vilya.harvey at gmail.com
Tue Mar 31 00:56:19 PDT 2009
- Previous message: Proposal: Collection Literals
- Next message: Proposal: Collection Literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Josh,
This would be a very nice feature to have. One small nit:
By substituting curly braces for the square brackets, you get a set literal
in place of a list:
final Set primes = { 2, 7, 31, 127, 8191, 131071, 524287 };
The literal syntax is the same as for an array initialisation, which could cause a bit of confusion. In the example - for example :-) - it looks like an array of ints is being autoboxed into a set., but I presume that won't actually be what happens (i.e. the assignment wouldn't compile if the literal was replaced by a variable with type int[])?
Vil
- Previous message: Proposal: Collection Literals
- Next message: Proposal: Collection Literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]