PROPOSAL: 'final' without explicit type (update) (original) (raw)
Marek Kozieł develop4lasu at gmail.com
Tue Mar 31 06:58:30 PDT 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: 'final' without explicit type (update)
- Next message: PROPOSAL: 'final' without explicit type (update)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
W dniu 31 marca 2009 15:43 użytkownik Tim Lebedkov <tim.lebedkov at googlemail.com> napisał:
Hello Marek,
my proposal (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-March/001055.html) is very similar to yours (it just uses 'auto' instead of 'final'). Does yours declare variables as final (I mean here 'constant') only because you try to avoid introducing a new keyword? Or is there another motivation? Tim
First of all I want Java to have clear separation on variables and values. And then:
- variables should have explicit type.
- values should have clear context;
While now people use variables even if they need value, it's because cost using value is higher than using variable. This provide worse code, more bugs, and provoke reusing variables.
-- Pozdrowionka. / Regards. Lasu aka Marek Kozieł
http://lasu2string.blogspot.com/
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: 'final' without explicit type (update)
- Next message: PROPOSAL: 'final' without explicit type (update)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]