try-with-resources and null resource (original) (raw)
Stephen Colebourne scolebourne at joda.org
Mon Jan 24 12:24:39 PST 2011
- Previous message: try-with-resources and null resource
- Next message: try-with-resources and null resource
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 24 January 2011 19:53, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
On 01/24/2011 08:30 PM, Tim Peierls wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Joe Darcy<joe.darcy at oracle.com> wrote:
I think this stack trace can easily be explained to programmers by saying "the suppressed exception comes from the close call you did have to write yourself." Agreed on all points, except I think you meant: s/did/didn't/ Am I the only one to think that having a generated code that throw an exception lately is a bad idea ?
No you're not alone. Having the exception thrown at the first line that the null is invalid would be preferable, as in enums.
The current behaviour isn't too bad, just non-optimal. For a new feature, I'd prefer it was optimal.
Stephen
- Previous message: try-with-resources and null resource
- Next message: try-with-resources and null resource
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]