Update on JSR 334 Expert Group activities (original) (raw)

Reinier Zwitserloot reinier at zwitserloot.com
Tue Jan 25 04:45:10 PST 2011

Hmm, you're right. __ all by itself is an identifier. Nevermind.

--Reinier Zwitserloot

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Bruce Chapman < brucechapman at paradise.net.nz> wrote:

On 25/01/2011 9:22 p.m., Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:

One good reason to disallow multiple underscores is to keep multiple underscores available for future language expansion. Presumably JDK7 isn't the last java release to have new language features. I admit I can't think of anything that would be best served by multiple underscores, but who knows what java needs 5 years from now?

so what future language expansion can you possibly foresee happening in the middle of a numeric literal? (which is the only place this single/multiple underscore issue relates to) It can't be used as a new operator because it is already a valid identifier. Bruce

More information about the coin-dev mailing list