My first webrev review request: 6850337 Hasher.java interprets given option value badly (original) (raw)
Andrew John Hughes gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Mon Jul 20 00:25:33 UTC 2009
- Previous message: My first webrev review request: 6850337 Hasher.java interprets given option value badly
- Next message: My first webrev review request: 6850337 Hasher.java interprets given option value badly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/7/19 Ulf Zibis <Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de>:
Martin, Sherman, Neal,
do you like to sponsor and review my CR ? Don't worry, it's very simple and small, best for getting familiar with the workflow. See: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/showbug.cgi?id=100090 Thanks, Ulf
As this bug is about a tool used during the build, your mail probably wants to be directed to the build list.
Are you sure this is not done by design and that mb is not in fact meant to be an exclusive rather than inclusive bound?
Have you checked that the OpenJDK can still be built with this change in place?
Thanks,
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net
PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8
- Previous message: My first webrev review request: 6850337 Hasher.java interprets given option value badly
- Next message: My first webrev review request: 6850337 Hasher.java interprets given option value badly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]