execvpe and glibc 2.10 (original) (raw)
Michael McMahon Michael.McMahon at Sun.COM
Tue Jul 28 12:43:55 UTC 2009
- Previous message: execvpe and glibc 2.10
- Next message: execvpe and glibc 2.10
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/7/9 Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com>:
Sorry, I should never have named a function (not even a static one) 'execvpe'. It's amusing that I broke myself by requesting that glibc implement 'execvpe'.
Here's the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk7/rename-execvpe/ For those following things, there are now 3 pending patches for UNIXProcessmd.c: rename-execvpe vfork-exec RESTARTABLE and there are more to come. Martin On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:32, Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Martin,
I am having trouble building IcedTea6 on Fedora 12 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1463798&name=build.log), it seems because this bug was fixed in glibc-2.10-3: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/showbug.cgi?id=10221 Do you have a patch for IcedTea/OpenJDK to get around this?
Martin, What happened to this patch? Has it been pushed to 6/7? Thanks, No, it hasn't been pushed yet. The vfork-exec one in particular needs some more testing before it can be pushed.
Michael.
- Previous message: execvpe and glibc 2.10
- Next message: execvpe and glibc 2.10
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]