Faster HashMap implementation (original) (raw)
Alex Yakovlev alex14n at gmail.com
Sat Jun 6 19:17:55 UTC 2009
- Previous message: Faster HashMap implementation
- Next message: Faster HashMap implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe,
Thank you for the link.
What I found strange is that non-Linked versions (simple HashSet and HashMap) passes all tests with CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER
TestSuite source I ran (scala): http://github.com/alex14n/CompactHashMap/blob/e2b81fb9ccf5446eff961d86eb3a0dc084a8a88c/test/Tests.scala
Alex
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Joe Kearney <Joe.Kearney at morganstanley.com>wrote:
Alex, Might I suggest you look at the test framework in Google Collections<http://code.google.com/p/google-collections/>? Extremely good coverage and only a couple of lines to set up. Tests for maps in java.util: http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#YXcrkXezIpQ/trunk/testfw/com/google/common/collect/testing/TestsForMapsInJavaUtil.java <http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#YXcrkXezIpQ/trunk/testfw/com/google/common/collect/testing/TestsForMapsInJavaUtil.java>See for example line 118.
Thanks, Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/attachments/20090606/7abe868c/attachment.html>
- Previous message: Faster HashMap implementation
- Next message: Faster HashMap implementation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]