Code review request for 6908131 Pure Java implementations of StrictMath.floor(double) &StrictMath.ceil(double) (original) (raw)
Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Fri Jan 29 05:13:50 UTC 2010
- Previous message: Code review request for 6908131 Pure Java implementations of StrictMath.floor(double) &StrictMath.ceil(double)
- Next message: Code review request for 6908131 Pure Java implementations of StrictMath.floor(double) &StrictMath.ceil(double)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think it's reasonable to have small microbenchmarks of JDK functionality in the openjdk code base. I've done that occasionally myself in the jdk/test directory.
More serious implementation-independent benchmarking efforts should probably have their own project, as with e.g. DaCapo. Maybe there's already a Java community benchmarking project that would be interested in math-related things?
Martin
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 22:04, Dmitry Nadezhin <Dmitry.Nadezhin at sun.com> wrote:
Joe,
I'm interested in micro-benchmarking of math in OpenJDK . This includes a choice of proper framework, a choice of representative patterns (or testsuites). Will math micro-benchmarking be ever hosted by OpenJDK ? Or I should develop them elsewhere ?
- Previous message: Code review request for 6908131 Pure Java implementations of StrictMath.floor(double) &StrictMath.ceil(double)
- Next message: Code review request for 6908131 Pure Java implementations of StrictMath.floor(double) &StrictMath.ceil(double)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]