RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package (original) (raw)
David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Mon Dec 5 02:52:07 UTC 2011
- Previous message: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package
- Next message: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks Chris and Doug et al. These fixups look good to me too.
One minor nit:
src/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicLong.java
The javadoc changes on longValue() changed actual text not just formatting. It changes it to be consistent with other methods, but is a change none-the-less. Not saying we can't do it, just pointing it out.
David
On 3/12/2011 3:18 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 12/ 2/11 04:22 PM, Doug Lea wrote: .... We just went through these and others, and believe that everything is now warning free. Thanks Doug, Wow you guys are quick! I pulled in these specific changes (atomic) and updated the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7117360/webrev.01/webrev/ I'm slowly working through the j.u.c.* classes and hope to have a webrev out next week. -Chris.
-Doug
- Previous message: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package
- Next message: RFR 7117360: Warnings in java.util.concurrent.atomic package
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]