array and diamond (original) (raw)
Rémi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Sun Dec 11 15:21:23 UTC 2011
- Previous message: array and diamond
- Next message: array and diamond
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/10/2011 12:38 PM, maurizio cimadamore wrote:
On 09-Dec-11 10:56 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
Is there a reason why the diamond syntax can't be used with an array ?
List<?>[] list = new List<>[12]; Because the current inference rules would end up inferring: List<?>[] list = new List[12]; If you special-cased diamond on arrays so that it is inferred as: List[] list = new List[12]; Then it would be safe.
but in that case List[] list = new List[12]; is not equivalent to static List[] foo() { ... } ... List<?>[] list = foo(); because as you said, Object will be inferred.
Is there another case where diamond inference behave differently from method inference ?
Maurizio
Rémi
- Previous message: array and diamond
- Next message: array and diamond
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]