Code Review Request for Bug #4802647 (original) (raw)
Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Dec 20 09:17:09 UTC 2011
- Previous message: Code Review Request for Bug #4802647
- Next message: Code Review Request for Bug #4802647
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 20/12/2011 00:12, David Holmes wrote:
Brandon,
I don't see the purpose of NewAbstractSet. It is identical to NewAbstractCollection. Otherwise my only concern is as you raised previously, updating the test to check existing subclasses causes new failures for ArrayList and CopyOnWriteArrayList. I'd suggest fixing ArrayList as part of this CR and file a new CR for COWAL so that Doug Lea can fix it upstream in the jsr166 cvs repository. Just to add to David's comments, if the change to COWAL/COWAS is separated into its own bug then it means that MOAT will need to skip the retainAll/removeAll(null) tests for these collections as we can't have this test (or any other) failing.
-Alan.
- Previous message: Code Review Request for Bug #4802647
- Next message: Code Review Request for Bug #4802647
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]