[Fwd: Re: hg: jdk7/tl/langtools: 7010194: several langtools regression failures after JSR 292 changes (b123)] (original) (raw)

Maurizio Cimadamore maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Wed Jan 5 11:53:37 UTC 2011

On 05/01/11 11:23, Alan Bateman wrote:

Hi maurizio, In my opinion, XlintWarn should also test invokeGeneric(). Moreover, it will be better to have one test by invoke*() instead of having one test for all invoke*()

Rémi Hi Remi I agree on your comments; however note that the aim of the XlintWarn test is to check that the compiler issues warnings in relation to old-style usage of 292 target typing - since the old syntax is going away (see related cleanup CR: 6992698). In other words, the aim of this changeset is to make tests pass again (with b123) awaiting for a more precise cleanup (which is needed since InvokeDynamic and other 292 features should be removed from the JDK 7 repo).

Maurizio

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list