RFR: 8004317 TestLibrary.getUnusedRandomPort() fails intermittently, but exception not reported (original) (raw)
Jim Gish jim.gish at oracle.com
Tue Dec 4 21:10:30 UTC 2012
- Previous message: RFR: 8004317 TestLibrary.getUnusedRandomPort() fails intermittently, but exception not reported
- Next message: RFR: 8004317 TestLibrary.getUnusedRandomPort() fails intermittently, but exception not reported
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The initial code was a bit strange in that it started out with an int set to the min "reserved" port number. I chose an Integer so I could start out with null rather than a magic number.
Jim
P.S. working on adding nestat -a output per Alan's suggestion.
On 12/04/2012 04:07 PM, Darryl Mocek wrote: > Hi Jim, >> changes look OK to me, although I'm curious why you chose to use an > Integer instead of an int. >> Darryl >> On 12/04/2012 12:03 PM, Jim Gish wrote: >> Please review >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgish/Bug8004317-TestLibrary-getUnusedRandomPort-Failure/ >> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ejgish/Bug8004317-TestLibrary-getUnusedRandomPort-Failure/> >>>>>> We're getting intermittent failures on a number of RMI tests >> attempting to get an unused ephemeral port. This is a temporary >> change to print a stack trace until we can figure what's going on. >> For some reason the test framework isn't surfacing the nested >> exception. (There probably should be a separate bug for that, but my >> first priority here is to fix the intermittent test failures.) >>>> Thanks, >> Jim >>>
Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304 Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team 35 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 jim.gish at oracle.com
- Previous message: RFR: 8004317 TestLibrary.getUnusedRandomPort() fails intermittently, but exception not reported
- Next message: RFR: 8004317 TestLibrary.getUnusedRandomPort() fails intermittently, but exception not reported
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]