Scaling problem of HashMap (introduced with alternative hashing) (original) (raw)

Mike Duigou mike.duigou at oracle.com
Thu Dec 27 19:55:06 UTC 2012


I am responding on the StackOverflow thread. I will look into using ThreadLocalRandom.

The random.next() is clearly a potential bottleneck but given that this happens only once per HashMap instance it is still unclear why a reasonable application would want to create hundreds or thousands of hash maps per second.

Mike

On Dec 27 2012, at 11:38 , Aleksey Shipilev wrote:

Looks very like dumb inlined java.util.Random? Is there a security threat to use ThreadLocalRandom instead there?

-Aleksey. On 27.12.2012, at 23:16, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu at gmail.com> wrote:

Reported by the SO question

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14010906 the HashMap constructor contains a CAS, which is kind of surprising. Could it be removed? transient final int hashSeed = sun.misc.Hashing.randomHashSeed(this); // CAS Zhong Yu



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list