Code review request for javadoc problem in java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle (original) (raw)

Mike Duigou mike.duigou at oracle.com
Tue Jan 10 03:44:59 UTC 2012

+1

On Jan 9 2012, at 18:17 , Joe Darcy wrote:

Hello,

Please review the simple patch below to fix a javadoc problem in java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle which stems from the arguments to the {@link} javadoc tag being reversed. Once reviewed, I'll file a bug for this and push the fix. Thanks, -Joe diff -r 858038d89fd5 src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java --- a/src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java Mon Jan 09 15:54:44 2012 -0800 +++ b/src/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandle.java Mon Jan 09 18:14:23 2012 -0800 @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ * generates a single invokevirtual instruction with * the symbolic type descriptor indicated in the following comment. * In these examples, the helper method {@code assertEquals} is assumed to - * be a method which calls {@link Objects.equals java.util.Objects#equals} + * be a method which calls {@link java.util.Objects#equals(Object,Object) Objects.equals } * on its arguments, and asserts that the result is true. * *

Exceptions

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list