JDK 8 code review request for 7132338 Use @code friendly idiom for '' in javadoc (original) (raw)

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Mon Jan 23 10:33:57 UTC 2012

On 23/01/2012 08:23, Joe Darcy wrote:

Hello,

Responding to some of code review feedback from Ulf about the unsigned API work, I've taken a pass at purging '\u0030' from the jdk repo's javadoc and replacing it with {@code '\u005Cu0030'} since {@code} is generally preferable. Webrev with these changes and other => {@code} transformations at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/7132338.0/ With these changes, the javadoc builds runs without additional warnings and a specdiff against a reference copy of the javadoc shows no unexpected changes. Thanks, -Joe I looked through the patch. Looks like there is an issue in java.io.RandomAccessFile where all usages have been changed to . In java.io.DataInput I see that the javadoc doesn't go beyond about column 40 in many cases and maybe it would be good to clean this up while you are there.

-Alan.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list