Bug 7176907 - Patches for javac warnings cleanup (text and util) from Adopt OpenJDK (original) (raw)
Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Wed Jun 27 16:09:57 UTC 2012
- Previous message: Bug 7176907 - Patches for javac warnings cleanup (text and util) from Adopt OpenJDK
- Next message: Bug 7176907 - Patches for javac warnings cleanup (text and util) from Adopt OpenJDK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all,
We've been working on improving the workflow for our patch review system and so the new locations for the patches are at:
https://raw.github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/PatchReview/master/5-submitted/javac_warnings/core_java_text.patch https://raw.github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/PatchReview/master/5-submitted/javac_warnings/core_java_util.patch
Cheers, Martijn
On 27 June 2012 08:58, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Kurchi,
Thanks for updating this. This looks good to me. I guess Stuart will be sponsoring the patch. For his sins he's kindly offered to do so yes :-) There are a couple of other switch statements in src/share/classes/java/util/regex/Pattern.java. which are not throwing fallthrough warnings (in Netbeans at least), although there is fallthrough happening from one case to another. From what I notice, only if there is a break statement missing before the "default" case, does Netbeans throw some warning. Is the fallthrough warning technically supposed to be thrown only when the logic falls through to the default case then? That's my understanding with the javac compiler yes. I think it was the balance that the javac folk thought was a sensible compromise in terms of not generating too many false positive warnings. Cheers, Martijn
- Previous message: Bug 7176907 - Patches for javac warnings cleanup (text and util) from Adopt OpenJDK
- Next message: Bug 7176907 - Patches for javac warnings cleanup (text and util) from Adopt OpenJDK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]