Review request 8002212 - adding read/writeObject to additional SerialXXX classes - (original) (raw)

Lance Andersen - Oracle Lance.Andersen at oracle.com
Sat Nov 3 14:11:00 UTC 2012

I revised the webrev, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8002212/webrev.01, taking into account the vast majority of Remi's suggestions.

I also added SerialStruct to the webrev.

Have a great weekend.

Best Lance On Nov 2, 2012, at 7:42 PM, Remi Forax wrote:

On 11/02/2012 11:57 PM, Lance Andersen - Oracle wrote:

This is similar to 8001536, just additional classes.

This adds read/writeObject, equals, clone methods to additional SerialXXX classes SQE, JCK and JDBC Unit tests all pass. The webrev can be viewed at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lancea/8002212/webrev.00 Hi Lance, in SerialArray.equals(), I prefer return baseType == sa.baseType && baseTypeName.equals(sa.baseTypeName)) && Arrays.equals(elements, sa.elements); instead of if(baseType == sa.baseType && baseTypeName.equals(sa.baseTypeName)) { return Arrays.equals(elements, sa.elements); } In SerialDataLink, do you really need readObject/writeObject given that you call the default implementations. in SerialJavaObject, in equals, you should declare a local variable like in SerialDataLink.equals, even if the local varialble is used once, it's more readable. Also like in SerialArray.equals, you can do a return directly instead of if(...) return true. in clone(), you can use the diamond syntax, sjo.chain = new Vector<>(chain); in setWarning(), you can use the diamond syntax as the original source does. and in readObject, you can use the diamond syntax too. In readObject, you forget to throw an exception if there are some static fields in getClass().getFields() as the constructor does (this code can be moved in a private static method). Also, you should add a comment that because you call getClass() on obj, there is an implicit null check. This can be fixed as a separated bug or not but the code of method SerialJavaObject.getField() is weird, the code checks if fields can be null, but fields is never null. Also, cloning the field array is perhaps a better idea if the reflection implementation doesn't cache the array of fields. In SerialRef.equals, again, if(...) return should be transformed into return ...

Best Lance cheers, Rémi Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 Lance.Andersen at oracle.com

-------------- next part --------------

Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 Lance.Andersen at oracle.com

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list