RFR: 8003380 - Compiler warnings in logging test code (original) (raw)
Michael Nascimento misterm at gmail.com
Sat Nov 17 03:01:24 UTC 2012
- Previous message: RFR: 8003380 - Compiler warnings in logging test code
- Next message: RFR: 8003380 - Compiler warnings in logging test code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Some of these are actually supported by NetBeans, such as:
LeakingThisInConstructor
Regards, Michael
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Stuart Marks <stuart.marks at oracle.com> wrote:
On 11/15/12 3:06 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/11/2012 22:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
- @SuppressWarnings("unused") Eclipse??? Do we have precedent for adding these suppressions?? I don't see it in the -Xlint options that javac supports so it might be specific to ECJ. I recall this topic came up during one of the warnings clean-up days, Stuart might remember the outcome. Yes, I gave an (Oracle internal) tech talk on warnings cleanup some time back where I mentioned this issue. I'll repeat the results here for everybody's benefit. The background is that the words that can be supplied to @SuppressWarnings reside in an uncontrolled namespace. The JLS [1] defines only "unchecked" and any others are compiler-specific. The set of words accepted here by javac is the same as the words defined for -Xlint. I did a survey of the sources in the jdk repo and found that the javac-defined warnings suppression tags were: deprecation fallthrough rawtypes serial try unchecked In addition, I found the following non-javac tags used: all empty-statement unused LeakingThisInConstructor OverridableMethodCallInConstructor ResultOfObjectAllocationIgnored SleepWhileHoldingLock UnnecessaryLocalVariable I actually have no idea which tool processes these. The names are suggestive though. I don't think we ever determined any policy about which names ought to be used in the OpenJDK code base. At the very least I think any of the javac -Xlint words is acceptable. I could be convinced that allowing others is a good idea (such as the Eclipse ones) if they're useful and a definition is available somewhere. s'marks [1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-9.html#jls-9.6.3.5
- Previous message: RFR: 8003380 - Compiler warnings in logging test code
- Next message: RFR: 8003380 - Compiler warnings in logging test code
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]