RFR-8008118 (original) (raw)
Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Tue Apr 2 22:29:55 UTC 2013
- Previous message: RFR-8008118
- Next message: RFR-8008118
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Mark Sheppard <mark.sheppard at oracle.com>wrote:
Hi Martin, are there any concerns that the string literal "." might be on the stack and not in data segment or heap?
Nope.
Also, is it assured that the returned parentPathv will never be de-allocated? I don't see parentPathv exposed beyond ** that of UNIXProcessmd.c, at least not directly.
It is not visible anywhere else. It's "permanently" allocated. Those of you thinking about shutting down and restarting a JVM within the same process will cringe - this is one of many "little leaks" in such an unsupported scenario.
- Previous message: RFR-8008118
- Next message: RFR-8008118
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]