JDK 8 code review request for 8005623: Retrofit FunctionalInterface annotations to core platform interfaces (original) (raw)
Joe Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Wed Feb 6 19:19:56 UTC 2013
- Previous message: JDK 8 code review request for 8005623: Retrofit FunctionalInterface annotations to core platform interfaces
- Next message: JDK 8 code review request for 8005623: Retrofit FunctionalInterface annotations to core platform interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/6/2013 12:54 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/02/2013 22:16, Joe Darcy wrote:
:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8005623.0/ This review is both to cover the addition of @FunctionalInterface to the types above and also to query if the annotation should be included in any of the other types below under the same bug. Looks good to me. I would also include PathMatcher and DirectoryStream.Filter in this first cut.
Will do; I'll add these to the set of impacted types and call that a day for round 1.
BTW: You mentioned XML as an area that you plan to look at it. One issue to be aware of is that they are currently compiled with the boot JDK so they can't make use of new APIs (this is true of the new build too, at least at this time).
Actually I had planned for the component teams to look at their own areas now that the candidates have been identified and the core interfaces annotated.
Thanks,
-Joe
- Previous message: JDK 8 code review request for 8005623: Retrofit FunctionalInterface annotations to core platform interfaces
- Next message: JDK 8 code review request for 8005623: Retrofit FunctionalInterface annotations to core platform interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]