Request for Review JDK-8006503:JVM_PrintStackTrace is not used in JDK (original) (raw)
Joseph Darcy joe.darcy at oracle.com
Fri Jan 25 21:19:51 UTC 2013
- Previous message: Request for Review JDK-8006503:JVM_PrintStackTrace is not used in JDK
- Next message: Request for Review JDK-8006503: JVM_PrintStackTrace is not used in JDK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks fine as far as I can see.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 1/24/2013 3:30 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote:
As far as Coleen and I are aware, this is internal-only. If anyone knows otherwise, please comment before the end of tomorrow.
Other than that, do you see any problems, Joe? On 01/24/13 15:41, Joe Darcy wrote: If this function was only usable with the JDK implementation (an internal JDK contract), then a ccc request is not needed.
HTH, -Joe On 1/24/2013 12:26 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote: I think the question was more of "does one need to be filed?"
On 01/24/13 15:15, Joe Darcy wrote: There is as of yet no ccc request for 8006503.
-Joe On 1/24/2013 12:11 PM, Eric McCorkle wrote: Joe, can you comment on this?
On 01/24/13 14:59, Coleen Phillimore wrote: What was the disposition of the CCC request? Was it decided not to do one because this function hasn't been used since before 1.4?
Code looks good to me. I removed the one in hotspot last week. Thanks, Coleen On 01/24/2013 10:59 AM, Eric McCorkle wrote: Hello,
Please review this trivial patch which removes JVMPrintStackTrace from jvm.h. It is no longer being used. The webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~emc/8006503/webrev.00/ The bug is here: http://bugs.sun.com/viewbug.do?bugid=8006503 Thanks, Eric
- Previous message: Request for Review JDK-8006503:JVM_PrintStackTrace is not used in JDK
- Next message: Request for Review JDK-8006503: JVM_PrintStackTrace is not used in JDK
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]