RFR 8005696: Add CompletableFuture - JEP 155 (original) (raw)

Doug Lea dl at cs.oswego.edu
Mon Mar 18 14:10:51 UTC 2013

On 03/15/13 09:43, Chris Hegarty wrote:

On 15/03/2013 12:00, Doug Lea wrote:

Yes, thanks! This keeps the exception specs consistent across similar methods. Now that I reread these method descriptions, I think thenAcceptBothXXX suffer the same problem:

Yes; thanks. And also a few other cases of non-symmetric doc/code constructions. Martin and I (thanks Martin!) did a couple of passes to try to hit them all. (Chris: maybe you could resync with CVS?)

The slogan for this class is: We write all the variants so users never have to. Some of the variants were added during a set of exchanges on concurrency-interest list last fall, which let some gratuitous differences creep in.

-Doug

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list