RFR: Optimize StringBuilder.append(null) (original) (raw)
Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Thu Mar 28 16:05:52 UTC 2013
- Previous message: RFR: Optimize StringBuilder.append(null)
- Next message: RFR: Optimize StringBuilder.append(null)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I took Laurent's suggestion of renaming count to c, even though the result looks like a value judgement on a competing programming environment:
value[c++] = 'n';
value[c++] = 'u';
value[c++] = 'l';
value[c++] = 'l';On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Laurent Bourgès <bourges.laurent at gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe the local var count could be renamed count or c to avoid name conflict with the member count and make the code more readable / obvious.
- Previous message: RFR: Optimize StringBuilder.append(null)
- Next message: RFR: Optimize StringBuilder.append(null)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]